Selecting the Best Smoothing Constant in a Supply Chain

When using exponential smoothing, the value of the smoothing constant chosen has a direct impact on the sensitivity of the forecast to recent data. If a manager has a good sense of the underlying demand pattern, it is best to use a smoothing constant that is no larger than 0.2. In general, it is best to pick smoothing constants that minimize the error term that a manager is most comfortable with from among MSE, MAD, and MAPE. In the absence of a preference among error terms, it is best to pick smoothing constants that minimize the MSE.

We illustrate the impact of picking smoothing constants that minimize different error mea­sures using the 10-period demand data shown in cells B3:B12 of Figure 7-5 (accompanying spreadsheet Chapter 7-Tahoe-salt and worksheet Figures 7-5, 6). The initial level is estimated using Equation 7.11 and is shown in cell C2. The smoothing constant a is obtained using Solver by minimizing the MSE (cell F13) at the end of the 10 periods as shown in Figure 7-5. The fore­cast shown in Figure 7-5 uses the resulting a = 0.54 and gives MSE = 2,460, MAD = 42.5, and MAPE = 2.1 percent.

The smoothing constant can also be selected using Solver by minimizing the MAD or the MAPE at the end of 10 periods. In Figure 7-6, we show the results from minimizing MAD (cell G13). The forecasts and errors with the resulting a = 0.32 are shown in Figure 7-6. In this case, the MSE increases to 2,570 (compared to 2,460 in Figure 7-5), whereas the MAD decreases to 39.2 (compared to 42.5 in Figure 7-5) and the MAPE decreases to 2.0 percent (compared to 2.1 percent in Figure 7-5). The major difference between the two forecasts is in Period 9 (the period with the largest error, shown in cell D11), when minimizing MSE picks a smoothing constant that reduces large errors, whereas minimizing MAD picks a smoothing constant that gives equal weight to reducing all errors even if large errors get somewhat larger.

In general, it is not a good idea to use smoothing constants much larger than 0.2 for extended periods of time. A larger smoothing constant may be justified for a short period of time when demand is in transition. It should, however, generally be avoided for extended periods of time.

Source: Chopra Sunil, Meindl Peter (2014), Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation, Pearson; 6th edition.

2 thoughts on “Selecting the Best Smoothing Constant in a Supply Chain

  1. Violette says:

    Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to assert that I get actually enjoyed account your blog
    posts. Anyway I will be subscribing to your augment and
    even I achievement you access consistently quickly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *