Let’s assume that education levels and visualization test scores are not normally distributed and/or other assumptions of the paired *t* test are violated. In fact, *mother’s education* was quite skewed (see Chapter 4). Let’s run the **Wilcoxon signed-ranks **nonparametric test to see if fathers have significantly higher educational levels than the mothers and to see if the *visualization test* is significantly different from the *visualization retest*. The assumptions of the Wilcoxon tests are similar to those for the Mann-Whitney test.

- (a) Are
*mother’s*and*father’s education*levels significantly different? (b) Are the*visualization*and*visualization retest*scores different?

- To answer these questions, select
**Analyze →****Nonparametric Tests →****Legacy Dialogs →****2 Related Samples…** - Highlight
*father’s education*and*mother’s education*and move them into the**Test Pairs:**Then, highlight*visualization test*and*visualization retest*and move them into the box. - Ensure that
**Wilcoxon**is checked in the**Test Type**dialog box. (See Fig. 9.6.) - Click on

Compare your syntax and output to Output 9.6.

**Output 9.6: Wilcoxon Nonparametric Test**

NPAR TEST

/WILCOXON=faed visual WITH maed visual2 (PAIRED)

/MISSING ANALYSIS.

**NPar Tests**

**Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test**

**Interpretation of Output 9.6**

Output 9.6 shows the nonparametric (Wilcoxon) analyses, which are similar to the paired *t* tests.

Note that the first table shows not only the mean ranks, but also the number of students whose mothers, for example, had less education than their fathers (27). Note that there were lots of ties (25) and almost as many women (21) that have more education than their husbands. However, overall the fathers had more education, as indicated by their lower mean rank (18.45) and the significant *z* (*p =* .037). The second table shows the significance level for the two tests. Note that the *p* or sig. values are quite similar to those for the paired *t* tests. Effect size measures are not

provided on the output, but again we can compute an *r* from the *z* scores and *N*s (Total) that are

shown in Output 9.6 using the same formula as for Problem 9.3 *r =* -.24 (i.e., -2.085/8.54) for the comparison of *mothers’* and *fathers’ education,* which is a small to medium effect size. For the comparison of the *visualization* and *visualization retest*, *r* = .46, a large effect size. Note that 55 students had higher *visualization test scores* while only 14 had higher *visualization retest* scores.

**How to Write About Output 9.6**

**Results**

Wilcoxon signed ranks tests were used to compare the education of each student’s mother and father. Of 73 students, 27 fathers had more education, 21 mothers had more education, and there were 25 ties. This difference indicating more education for fathers is significant, *z* = 2.09, *p* = .037, *r* = -.24, a small to medium effect size. Similarly, the visualization test scores were significantly higher than the visualization retest scores, *N* = 75, *z* = 3.98, *p* < .001, *r* = -.46, a large effect according to Cohen (1988).

Source: Morgan George A, Leech Nancy L., Gloeckner Gene W., Barrett Karen C.

(2012), *IBM SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation*, Routledge; 5th edition; download Datasets and Materials.

16 Sep 2022

16 Sep 2022

15 Sep 2022

20 Sep 2022

19 Sep 2022

15 Sep 2022